It’s funny. Voting is mostly about everyone voting the way it’s best or the way it really is.
If someone thinks otherwise, they vote as they see fit. You have one address and want to have more for yourself, someone has many addresses because he also wants to have more for himself. Just because someone has multiple addresses does not mean that he is a bot or just trash who is here only for airdrop. Many addresses can mean big engagement in many projects and diversification of portfolio.
Generally all polls have one big problem. Most of them vote without even reading what or vote just to vote and get the benefits of various grants. This is the problem with most voting. It’s not that simple.voting in decentralized applications does not play its role as originally intended and there are many doubts about it
I have many addresses, on many I had DEXT token for more than a year (which means I could have picked up a lot of dex guru nft for free but I didn’t ). I bought a lot of NFTS dex guru before information about airdrop and when team wrote that there will be no airdrop. I spent on NFT alone about 3000 thousand dollars.
So I wanted to support the project. I have donated a lot of money to open sea and I am involved in voting on accounts. Does it mean that I am not valuable and airdrop is for you, because I am much bigger than you, I make daily turnover on the markets which you cannot make in 1 year?
I was the one who took the risk at an early stage when no one guaranteed me anything - who takes the risk wins
This is all one big mockery. The team should manually check each address and make a fair decision because there should be many criteria and each situation is completely different.
I bought tokens at 0.06 - 0.12 eth, the team itself created the possibility of buying them, they themselves wrote that there will be no airdrop. I like risk and I trade and speculate a lot. And now such XYZ person will write what is best for him and most people choose not what is good for the project but for themselves. Therefore, as in a democracy where the majority chooses, it does not make much sense. The majority chooses wrong.
The dex.guru team should think about what is really most suitable and what kind of user will be valuable. and not every first user who has a turnover of 1000 , 500 or 100 dollars in a year.
Such a user. He’ll take the airdrop and go away. Even if he has only one account.
I would use dex.guru for a long time on many accounts, I would leave 10 times more money for development or for using accounts and allerts (like on dextools app - 200 allerst per acc… ) which you still do not have by the way
And btw2. There is such a thing as a power vote. Is if someone has a bigger share (in this case - more nfts) . He gave more. He’s committed more. Doesn’t that mean his vote is worth more? How can you treat every vote the same? A bigger contribution means a bigger vote.
In theory. Because real bots won’t have their addresses listed. I’ll ask the team. If someone is a real hunter and spammer. What is the problem to create regular unlinked accounts and have even 1000 of them. Make 1000 accounts to which I send funds from the stock exchange/ternado/wormholes etc so that there are no links? Therefore the number and volumes of transactions should be the key and not the fact that someone has several addresses! Who is really a real and genuine user here and who is really a smoker? Or maybe the author of the topic has already thought it over and knew how to create an army of his own bots that do not link his accounts and thus collects everything? Does it make sense? In theory it is possible isn’t it ?